Science begins with the observed data and then attempts to find an answer that fits with all the data. It will alter it's conclusion as more data becomes available if it opposes the conclusion. Creationism begins with a conclusion, that God exists, and then finds data that fits with the conclusion. It is not open to altering it's conclusion in the face of opposing evidence. Can you not see that that method can be falsified or wrong much more easily than the scientific method?
No comments:
Post a Comment